*** the distribution of the votes must correspond to the distribution of the seats if a [[parti politique|party]] gets 20% of the votes, it has to get around 20% of the seats -> the match is always a bit *inexact* -> It can be *more or less proportional* depending on [[District magnitude]] -> it very often includes correction in order to limit the number and fractionisation of the Parliament. Many [[État|countries]] have adopted a [[threshold of the share of votes]] t (like 5%) *Most common variants to determine how we allocate the seats* in Italy the [[highest average method]] (à revoir sur [[Internet|internet]]) [[largest remainders method]] [[single transferable vote]] Small changes can have huge impact on the distribution of the seats There are no incredible and perfect alternative. il traduit fidèlement la diversité des courants politiques et assure une meilleure correspondance entre [[opinion publique]] et [[représentation]].[^1] En retour, il fragmente l’assemblée et impose une logique de [[coalitions in parliamentary regimes|coalition]]. L’élection dépend alors fortement des partis, puisque les élus doivent figurer aux bons rangs sur les listes. Cela augmente aussi le [[risque]] d’[[instabilité gouvernementale]].  ## Notes de bas de page ``` dataview TABLE length(file.outlinks) AS "Liens sortants", length(file.inlinks) AS "Liens entrants" WHERE file.path = this.file.path ``` [^1]: contrairement au [[scrutin majoritaire]] qui laisse de grosses fractions de l'opinion publique sans sièges